Legal Opinion
Larian v. Larian
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 2004No. B171891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*754Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Isaac Lañan, appeals from an order denying his motion to compel arbitration. The lawsuit containing numerous causes of action was filed by plaintiff, Farhad Lañan. Plaintiff and defendant are brothers. We conclude there is no evidence the parties signed the September 28, or December 4, 2000, arbitration agreements because of any fraud in the inception or execution as defined by the California Supreme Court in Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 415-416 [58 Cal.Rptr.2d 875, 926 P.2d 1061]. In the absence of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garrison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Turtle Ridge Media Group, Inc. v. Pacific Bell DirectoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Duick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- J.H. Boyd Enterprises, Inc. v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Larian v. LarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004