Legal Opinion

United States v. Avery

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 1, 2020No. 19-1414Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-1414 United States v. Avery UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Feng Li, AKA Li Feng Zhao Hui, AKA Hui Zhao, Ru Jie Lu, AKA Ru Lu JieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Bobby VenableCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API