State Electro-Medical Institute v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county: AIjEXander C. Troup, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.
This was an information in the nature of quo warranto to prevent the defendant from doing business in this state. According to the pleadings and stipulation of facts, the defendant is a foreign corporation, and has an office in the city of Omaha, and transacts its business there. It is alleged in the information:
“Said defendant is engaged in the business of practicing medicine for hire, and it contracts to, and through its agents does, assume for hire to practice medicine, prescribe for and treat the physical ailments of human beings, and does by and through its officers and agents- and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Underwood v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- State v. Bailey Dental Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Rohrer v. Hastings Brewing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Golding v. Schubach Optical Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.