Legal Opinion
Carl Hobbs v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 27, 2025No. 8:25-cv-01373Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CARL HOBBS, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civ. No. DLB-25-1373 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN * AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, * Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 17, 2025, a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) bus collided with Carl Hobbs’s parked vehicle, totaling the vehicle. Hobbs, an attorney who represents himself in this litigation, filed suit against WMATA in state court. WMATA removed the case to this Court. Hobbs filed an amended complaint and a motion for entry of default against WMATA. WMATA then moved to dismiss…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fitzgerald v. First East Seventh Street Tenants Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.