Glenn v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, Barry Glenn appeals his conviction of possession of methamphetamine, 1 contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that the arresting officer discovered the methamphetamine during an allegedly improper seizure of other suspected contraband. We disagree and affirm.
When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s judgment of the facts. First, when a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Galindo-Eriza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Howard Gowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- Oldfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Orienthal Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.