Legal Opinion

Nicholas Alan Nehring v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D16-3252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS III, STANLEY H., ASSOCIATE JUDGE.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred by failing to enter a written order determining his competence to stand trial, and he argues that the court abused its discretion when it allowed the state to impeach his only witness with seventeen-year-old felony convictions.

First, the trial court is required to enter a written order of competency. Mullens v. State, 197 So.3d 16, 37 (Fla. 2016). The trial court orally found Appellant competent to stand trial, but it failed to enter a written order memorializing that finding.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Khadafy Kareem Mullens v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Pryor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Trowell v. J.C. Penney Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keith Matthew McCray v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. JOSE REYNA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API