Nicholas Alan Nehring v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIS III, STANLEY H., ASSOCIATE JUDGE.
Appellant raises two issues on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred by failing to enter a written order determining his competence to stand trial, and he argues that the court abused its discretion when it allowed the state to impeach his only witness with seventeen-year-old felony convictions.
First, the trial court is required to enter a written order of competency. Mullens v. State, 197 So.3d 16, 37 (Fla. 2016). The trial court orally found Appellant competent to stand trial, but it failed to enter a written order memorializing that finding.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Khadafy Kareem Mullens v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Pryor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Trowell v. J.C. Penney Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keith Matthew McCray v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- JOSE REYNA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020