Paton & Co. v. Chambliss & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. June 21, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
1. Where a creditor sued out a garnishment proceeding based upon a pending action, and thereafter obtained judgment against the defendant, and, while this judgment was before the Supreme Court for review, caused an additional summons of garnishment to be issued on the original affidavit and bond: Meld, that, after the affirmance of the judgment of the trial court by the Supreme Court, it was not erroneous to dismiss the garnishment proceeding in so far as it related to the last summons issued. Under the facts recited, the same was not authorized by that part of section 4709 of the Civil Code…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. Patton Sash, Door & Building Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Curry v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Darnall v. Wood & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Moore & Valentino v. ReadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boland v. BargeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Woods v. Massachusetts MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Trust Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928