Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mull v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1994No. 95200, (Calendar No. 10)Published

1DissentGriffin, J.

Because I conclude that the front-end loader in this case, which was operated in the parking lot of a shopping mall, is not a "motor vehicle” within the meaning of the civil liability act, MCL 257.401 et seq.; MSA 9.2101 et seq., commonly referred to as the owner liability statute, I respectfully dissent.__,

*524I

I would add to the statement of facts provided by the majority the information that because the accident occurred in the course of plaintiff’s employment, he received benefits under the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act1 from the insurance carrier of his employer, tcc. The record…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. White v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Palmer v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API