Legal Opinion

Emery v. Ottumwa Direct Service Stations

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1935No. 43107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This is a compensation ease, and the only question involved on this appeal is as to whether or not there is sufficient competent evidence in the record to support an award under the Compensation Act (Code 1931, section 1361 et seq.). The claimant, Clarice Emery, was the wife of Leo Emery, the deceased workman. The case was first decided by Hon. Ralph Young, deputy industrial commissioner, in which decision appellee was awarded the statutory compensation. On review before the industrial commissioner, the award of the deputy commissioner ivas affirmed, and, on appeal to the district court of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Hanson v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Diederich v. Tri-City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mook v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API