Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Brown

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion for rehearing of case reported 33 Neb., 657.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

A motion for a rehearing has been filed in this case, accompanied with very full and elaborate briefs. The principal ground upon which a rehearing is sought is that the service of summons on Jane Holliday in the former suit was sufficient and we are referred to the case of Palmer v. Belcher, 21 Neb., 58, to support that proposition. In that case the return was, “ On the 23d day of August, 1884,1 served the same on the within named defendant, H. J. Palmer, by leaving a copy of the within summons with George Palmer, and by him, the said George Palmer, in my presence at the time…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W. V. Morse & Co. v. EngleNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Palmer v. BelcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Georgia v. Public Resource.Org, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Maxwell v. HamelNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brumbaugh v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Radzuweit v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API