Legal Opinion

Claim of La Belle v. Britton Stone & Supply Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants contend that because the claimant was industrially blind at the time of the accident he was not entitled to an award for 100 per cent loss of vision. The prior accident causing said industrial blindness was not caused by an industrial accident, and, therefore, cannot be considered and does not bar claimant from a full schedule award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'rCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Burrock v. Tung Sol Lamp Works, Inc.New York County Court, Essex County · 1954
  4. Claim of Ladutsky v. Tri-Motor Auto ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'rCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945