Moss v. Kaump
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
On appeal from an o-rder of the trial -court granting a new ‘trial, defendant asserts that the trial court was without jurisdiction to- 'hear the motion.
Plaintiff claimed the delivery of certain property in the possession of the defendant. The verdict of the jury was entered June 17, 1936. After judgment on the verdict, and on the 26th day o-f June, A. D. 1936, plaintiff served a notice of intention to- move for a new trial, assigning several of the statutory grounds, including the ground1 of insufficiency of the evidence to- justify the verdict. By this notice of intention, plaintiff elected…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuller v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Stokes v. RabenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Thompson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Sully v. EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Frank v. RuzickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.