Legal Opinion

McCall v. . Sustair

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, J., dissents; HOKE, J., concurs in the dissenting opinion. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. This is an action for slander, on an allegation that the defendant had charged the plaintiff with stealing cotton, said charge having been made on three several occasions, viz., to John Cochrane, to L. A. Ferguson, and to Charles Simpson. Neither justification nor privilege was pleaded, but a denial of having charged the plaintiff with larceny.

The issues submitted were:(180) "Did the defendant speak and publish of and concerning the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fields v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Lucas v. . NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  3. Hampton v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  4. McBrayer v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
  5. Louder v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vincent v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Castelloe v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Long v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Robinson v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API