Legal Opinion

Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. Leonard E. Conrad, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1972No. 6839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This appeal challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to show that a piece of equipment was delivered to the carrier in good condition for shipment.

Leonard E. Conrad, Inc., a plumbing and heating contractor, commenced this action against Pacific Intermountain Express Company to recover $6,536.72 for damage to a demineralizer which is used to make high purity water. Comad alleged that the damage occurred while the unit was transported in interstate commerce by P.I.E. The district court awarded Conrad, Inc., the full amount of its claim plus interest and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Hoover Motor Express Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. A.T. Clayton & Co., Inc. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Troute v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API