Legal Opinion

Orient B. & L. Ass'n v. Gould

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1913No. Appeal, No. 349PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 349, Jan. T., 1912, by Harry L. Randal and Brinah Rheinstrom, defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1909, No. 3457, on verdict in favor of plaintiff in case of Orient Building and Loan Association v. Isador M. Gould, Mortgagor, Harry L. Randal, Isador M. Gould and Brinah Rheinstrom, Real Owners. Proceeding on scire facias sur mortgage against mortgagor and appellants, as real owners.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 349, Jan. T., 1912, by Harry L. Randal and Brinah Rheinstrom, defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1909, No. 3457, on verdict in favor of plaintiff in case of Orient Building and Loan Association v. Isador M. Gould, Mortgagor, Harry L. Randal, Isador M. Gould and Brinah Rheinstrom, Real Owners. Proceeding on scire facias sur mortgage against mortgagor and appellants, as real owners. Before Martin, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,629.00 against the mortgagor…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

This case repeats, without material variation, the conditions presented in Excelsior Saving Fund v. Cochran, 220 Pa. 634, and that case governs this. In the case referred to, following the earlier case of Park Bros. & Co. v. Oil City Boiler Works, 204 Pa. 453, we held that the Act of July 9, 1901, P. L. 614, as its title indicates, is an act regulating the service of process merely, and that it in no way changes the jurisdiction of the courts. In the tenth section of the act, amended by Act of April 23, 1903, P. L. 261, it is provided, that the plaintiff in any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Excelsior Saving Fund v. CochranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Jarrett v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  4. Miltenberger v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Home Land Co. v. R. NyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Bradley v. Price, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1958
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Anderson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977
  5. Wick v. AlworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API