Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manly v. Manly

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1984Published

1DissentLeibson, Justice

Respectfully I dissent. The issue before us is not a matter of jurisdiction, but only of procedure. Jurisdiction derives from the Judicial Article of the Kentucky Constitution, Sec. 109-124. The rule in question is a court made rule pursuant to the Kentucky Constitution, Section 116:

“The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe rules governing its appellate jurisdiction ... and rules of practice and procedure for the Court of Justice.”

We prescribe the rules and we interpret the rules. We decide whether and when to require strict compliance. We must accept the responsibility for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Foremost Insurance Co. v. ShepardKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ritchie v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API