Legal Opinion

Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 2024No. 5:24-cv-00220Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CHARLES R. BOWLDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-220-SLP ) OKLAHOMA INDIGENT ) DEFENSE SYSTEM, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) O R D E R Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] (R.&R.), issued by United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks civil rights relief, alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Colby v. HerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API