Legal Opinion

Midwest Federal Savings Bank v. Symington

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1986No. Civ. 11211-11214PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Paul Symington has appealed from a memorandum decision clarifying the district court’s previous memorandum decision that addressed various questions concerning a trustee’s collection of rents from and payment of expenses for commercial property undergoing foreclosure. We dismiss the appeal.

The right of appeal in this State is statutory and is a jurisdictional matter which we may consider sua sponte. Olson v. Job Service North Dakota, 379 N.W.2d 285 (N.D.1985). Generally, a memorandum decision is not appealable under § 28-27-02, N.D.C.C. Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. AlbrechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brown v. WillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vanderhoof v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lang v. Bank of SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. American Insurance Co. v. Midwest Motor Express, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Morley v. MorleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API