Herron v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Pursuant to OCGA § 22-2-100 et seq., condemnation proceedings were initiated to acquire three easements over a portion of appellantcondemnee’s residential property. The first easement was a four-month temporary construction easement “for all purposes necessary or incidental to Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority’s [(MARTA)] construction of a rapid transit system and for any other use reasonably related thereto. ...” The second easement was a permanent utility easement for an underground sanitary sewer system. The third easement was a four-month temporary right of access…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Wright v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Simon v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Stolz v. ShulmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- White v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. 0.095 ACRES OF LANDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.