Legal Opinion

Herron v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1985No. 71070PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Pursuant to OCGA § 22-2-100 et seq., condemnation proceedings were initiated to acquire three easements over a portion of appellantcondemnee’s residential property. The first easement was a four-month temporary construction easement “for all purposes necessary or incidental to Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority’s [(MARTA)] construction of a rapid transit system and for any other use reasonably related thereto. ...” The second easement was a permanent utility easement for an underground sanitary sewer system. The third easement was a four-month temporary right of access…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Wright v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Simon v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Stolz v. ShulmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Department of Transportation v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. White v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. 0.095 ACRES OF LANDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API