Legal Opinion

Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 15, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02087Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 MARC CARBONELL, Case No.2:24-CV-2087 JCM (NJK) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 SEATGEEK, INC., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is defendant SeatGeek, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration, 14 transfer venue or, alternatively, to dismiss the action. (ECF No. 19). Plaintiff Mars Carbonell, 15 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,1 filed a response (ECF No. 25), to which 16 defendant replied. (ECF No. 26). 17 Also before the court is plaintiff’s motion to strike or leave to file sur-reply.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API