Legal Opinion

Western Fruit Growers, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1941No. 9717PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The complaint herein is entitled “For Injunction to Enforce and to Prevent Violation of Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937” and alleges that it is a proceeding brought under Section 8a(6)1 of the said Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq., and that its purpose is to enforce the provisions of Order No. 2 of the Secretary of Agriculture regulating the handling of oranges and grapefruit grown in the States of California and Arizona, and to prevent and restrain the defendants from handling oranges in current of interstate commerce…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Ballard v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Houses, Inc. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. City of Fresno v. EdmonstonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Tsang v. KanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. H.P. Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API