Legal Opinion
United States v. Akinrosotu
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 28, 2011No. Docket 09-2333-crPublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant Tolulope Akinrosotu (“defendant”) appeals from a May 18, 2009 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The question presented is the scope of the District Court’s authority, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2), to modify defendant’s $50,000 fine. We hold, assuming arguendo that the District Court has any authority at all to modify the fine, that it may modify only the amount that remains unpaid at the commencement of defendant’s supervised release.
BACKGROUND
On June 23, 1994, following a trial by jury, defendant was convicted of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Anthony Simmonds, A/K/A Anthony Simmons v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Daniel J. Waletzki v. P.W. Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Silvio SpalloneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ionia Management, S.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- 23-34 94th St. Grocery Corp. v. New York City Board of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Havens v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Wallace v. StateDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.