Legal Opinion
State v. Ott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 12, 1981No. C76-02-02198 CA 19656 (Control), No. C80-08-32846 CA 19657PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*311YOUNG, J.
This is a consolidated appeal of two criminal cases. The primary issue is the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress. We affirm.
In 1976, defendant pled guilty to robbery in the second degree. Imposition of sentence was suspended, and defendant was granted five years probation. In 1980, he was convicted of robbery in the first degree and sentenced to a term of 20 years. He seeks reversal of his conviction of first degree robbery and of the order revoking his probation.
At 4:57 p.m. on August 21, 1980, Officer Knudsen of the Portland Police Department received a radio report that a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BotelhoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HagemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. SteinkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. GasconIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.