Legal Opinion

Lansill v. Burnet

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 28, 1932No. Nos. 5294-5299PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

These consolidated appeals relate to income taxes for the years 1921 to 1924, inclusive. The issue arises in a case wherein certain heirs employed an attorney to contest their ancestor’s will, agreeing to pay him for his services a sum equal to 19 per cent, of the amount recovered in the litigation as and when received by them. Certain mineral royalties payable annually were secured by the attorney for the heirs, and were thereafter regularly collected by a bank under instructions of the heirs to pay the amount of the attorney’s fees directly to him, which was done. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. United States v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Hutchings v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Hutchings v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  3. Teschner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. Gadlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  5. Longyear v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API