Legal Opinion

DAWKINS v. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00733Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD DAWKINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 23-733 v. ) Judge Nora Barry Fischer ) DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This employment discrimination case involving Plaintiff Richard Dawkins’ (“Plaintiff”) claims alleging sex/race discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. against his current employer, Defendant Duquesne Light Company,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Briscoe v. KlausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Bechtel Corporation and Bechtel Power Corporation v. Local 215, Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API