Legal Opinion

Valentino v. Keller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1969No. 68-514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

On the motion for reinstatement, the issue was whether the motion had been filed within “ten years from the last payment theretofore made of compensation” to the claimant, as specified in Section 4123.52, Revised Code (122 Ohio Laws 268, 276). Unless it had been so filed, then, under the provisions 'of that statute, the commission could not reinstate the claim. That issue was submitted by the trial court to the jury.

The claimant contends that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury by referring to the adverse rulings of the administrator, the Board of Review and the Industrial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Bossert Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jones v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. B.O.C. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Robinson v. B.O.C. Group Gen. Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Logarusic v. King Musical Instruments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Vinson v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API