Benn v. Cole (In Re Benn)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentKressel, Chief Judge
Because I disagree with the majority’s premise that “not being subject to attachment and execution” is the equivalent of “exempt” or “exempt from attachment and execution,” I dissent.
Before October 1, 1979, the concepts of exempt property and property not subject to attachment were explicitly distinct. Under § 70(a) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 (“Act”), the trustee was “vested by operation of law with the title of the bankrupt ... except insofar as it is to property which is held to be exempt ....” 11 U.S.C. § 110(a) (repealed). In other words, exempt property never came into what we now…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.