Tripati v. McKay
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM***
Anant Kumar Tripati appeals the district court’s decision dismissing his pro se civil rights action against Maricopa County and various Maricopa County officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.
I
The district court correctly held that Tripati’s federal claims — only one of which he asserts on appeal — were barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Tripati argues that the district court erred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harvey v. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.