Legal Opinion

Tripati v. McKay

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 8, 2006No. 04-17148Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM***

Anant Kumar Tripati appeals the district court’s decision dismissing his pro se civil rights action against Maricopa County and various Maricopa County officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.

I

The district court correctly held that Tripati’s federal claims — only one of which he asserts on appeal — were barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Tripati argues that the district court erred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harvey v. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API