Legal Opinion

Scott v. George

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). The proffered excuse that plaintiff did not understand that he could not proceed pro se while represented by an attorney does not constitute a reasonable excuse for the untimely service of the complaint nor does it excuse his failure to submit an affidavit of merit (see, Redding v Saunders, 213 AD2d 1015, lv denied 85 NY2d 811; Brooks v Inn at Saratoga Assn., 188…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kel Management Corp. v. Rogers & WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Brooks v. Inn at Saratoga AssociationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Sabatino v. Albany Medical Center HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Redding v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Yule v. ComerfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API