Marshall v. American General Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
John T. Nixon, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 1), and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and accompanying Memorandum in Law (Doc. Nos. 18 and 19). Defendants responded by filing a Brief in Opposition to the Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 41), and Plaintiffs filed a Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 69). Defendants also filed a Motion to Amend Notice of Removal, and Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion to Remand (Doc. Nos. 21 and 35), which are held in abeyance for the reasons explained below. A hearing on the issues involved in the Remand and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nixon v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001