Legal Opinion

Moore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 13, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On exceptions by appellant. The appellant, a former guardian of Arthur T. Gould, filed his final account as such guardian in the Probate Court, and the same was allowed.

Read the full summary

On exceptions by appellant. The appellant, a former guardian of Arthur T. Gould, filed his final account as such guardian in the Probate Court, and the same was allowed. From this decree allowing said account, an appeal was taken to Supreme Court of Probate and the case was reported to the Law Court, and is reported in 112 Maine, 119. At the September term of the Supreme Judicial Court, 1914, the appellant filed a motion asking the court to state appellant’s account and make corrections, etc. The presiding Justice denied the motion and ordered; “That in accordance with certificate from Law…

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

The appellant was formerly guardian of Arthur T. Gould whose petition to reopen the first and final account of the appellant was granted by the Judge of Probate of Knox County on July 16, 1912. From the decree of the Judge of Probate granting said petition and adjudging the amount of the liability of the appellant as such guardian, appeal was taken by the appellant to the Supreme Court of Probate, and the case was then reported by agreement to this court for determination as in 112 Maine, 119.

The case was argued at the June Law Term, 1913. On July 1st, 1914, certificate of decision was sent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White's Admrx. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Town of St. George v. TilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mattison v. SmalleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. State v. GravesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API