Dennis Kathios v. General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This case offers food for thought in several senses of the phrase. Defendant says that plaintiff has had one bite of the apple and cannot take a second. Plaintiff contends that his initial bite was but a nibble, and that the fruit is not now forbidden. The district court found defendant’s view of the prandial arrangements more palatable, and granted summary judgment accordingly. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts germane to this appeal are not much in dispute. On August 16, 1981, plaintiff-appellant Dennis Kathios and two friends, Marc Spellman and Stephen Chick, mixed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.