Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1994No. Nos. 92-16393, 92-16439PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

The appellants, Margaret Dowling and Vernon Cox, individually and on behalf of two certified subclasses of plaintiffs — recipients and beneficiaries of California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal (hereinafter “the Dowling Medicaid class”), and recipients and providers of In-Home Support Services (hereinafter “the Dowling IHSS class”) — and intervenors Service Employees International Union, Local 434, AFL-CIO (hereinafter “Service Employees”), appeal the judgment of the district court denying their respective motions for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Allum v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Roth v. Veteran's Administration of the Government of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Dowling v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Theodore R. Anderson v. Northern Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Maitland v. Mitchell (In re Harris Pine Mills)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Rehrs v. IAMS Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Rosetta Brock v. Ned Ray McWherterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API