Legal Opinion

In re Leeds Woolen Mills

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 22, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This petition of the trustee against Hines for the recovery of about $500 worth of goods received by him from the referee in bankruptcy, acting as receiver or custodian of .the property, has been twice on reference before the standing master, and is before the court again upon a second report sustaining the title of the trustee to the goods. Objection is taken again to the jurisdiction of the court, that question having been reserved from the beginning.

Both counsel seem under the misapprehension that it is necessary for the court to decide the question of adverse ownership as one involved in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. White v. SchloerbSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bush v. Export Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1904
  2. Trigg Co. v. Bucyrus Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. In re LipmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  4. Shook v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API