Legal Opinion

State v. Estridge

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 30, 1995No. 2409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

On December 31, 1992, Carl C. Estridge, pursuant to Act No. 310,1992 S.C. Acts 1904, agreed in writing to the transfer from the circuit court to the magistrate’s court of a case in which he was charged with second offense driving under the influence. Estridge’s jury trial in the magistrate’s court concluded on July 1, 1993, and resulted in a guilty verdict. Estridge appealed to the circuit court, alleging, as he does here, his conviction should be overturned on the ground that the magistrate’s court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try his case on July 1, 1993, because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Green v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Soil Remediation Co. v. Nu-Way Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API