Legal Opinion

Campbell Printing Press & Manuf'g Co. v. Marden

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 26, 1895No. 285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a suit in equity by tlie Campbell Printing-Press & Manufacturing Company against George -V. Harden and Edward T. liowell, copartners as Harden & lío well, for infringement of letters patent No. 292,521, issued January 8, .1884, to Wellington P. Kidder, for a printing machine, and No. 379,053, issued January 3, 1888, to John J-T. Stonemetz, for a web printing machine. Heard on motion to open the decree for the admission of new proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

CARPENTER, District Judge.

In this case a decree for an injunction and an account was ordered in December last. 64 Fed. 782. An appeal was taken by the respondents, and they have dismissed that appeal, without prejudice to their right to' move to reopen the decree and to take further evidence and to reargue the case, pursuant to the opinion of the circuit court of appeals rendered in May last. 15 C. C. A. 26, 67 Fed. 809. The respondents now move to reopen the decree, to amend their answer and to introduce further evidence. The purpose of this motion is to put in evidence, as bearing on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marden v. Campbell Printing-Press & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
  2. Campbell Printing-Press & Manuf'g Co. v. MardenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jensen v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Nutter v. MossbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API