Legal Opinion

Marin Municipal Water District v. City of Mill Valley

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1988No. A038728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

A jury found against appellant City of Mill Valley and for respondent Marin Municipal Water District in an inverse condemnation action. The city appeals, contending that public property cannot be taken for purposes of inverse condemnation and that the district’s franchise is not a compensable property interest. We affirm the judgment.

I. Facts

On December 9, 1983, Hillside Avenue in Mill Valley collapsed and slid onto two parcels owned by John T. Swayne. He filed an inverse condemnation action against respondent Marin Municipal Water District, alleging that the landslide was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. The City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Sherrell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Joshua Hill, Inc. v. Whitemarsh Township Authority (In Re Joshua Hill, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Siskiyou County v. PacifiCorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. The City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Sherrell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API