Legal Opinion
Tamara B. v. Pete F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order of the Family Court, New York County (Ruth Jane Zuckerman, J.), entered May 20, 1991, which dismissed petitioner-appellant’s paternity petition, affirmed, without costs.
On a prior appeal (Tamara B. v Pete F., 146 AD2d 487, amended 157 AD2d 636), this court reversed an order denying the paternity petition and remanded the matter to reopen the trial for the purpose of receiving testimony of petitioner’s expert witness in rebuttal to testimony presented by respondent’s expert. On remand, Family Court ruled that the rebuttal testimony did not dispel the questions raised by respondent’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Herring v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In Re the Estate of SylvestriNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Tamara B. v. Pete F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Tamara B. v. Pete F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Rita VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pickard v. PickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Thomas S. v. Robin Y.New York City Family Court · 1993