Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Roesel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 1986No. 85-334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal turns upon the construction of certain agreements concerning the exploitation of an invention.

In 1967, John F. Roesel, the inventor of an electric generator and the owner of patents thereon, entered into an agreement (1967 agreement) under which Rohe Meyer acquired a 10% interest in the invention in consideration of his legal services rendered as a patent attorney concerning the invention. The agreement recited that the “sale is a sale of a ten percent (10%) interest to all rights in said invention, including the right to make, use and sell same.” The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. John R. Willingham, Star Cutter Company, Joined as v. Norman B. Lawton, and Star Cutter Company, PartyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Sternberg v. SternbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Elliott Enterprises, Inc. v. SerotaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franz Tractor Co. v. JI Case Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Hatton v. BARNETT BANK OF PALM BEACH CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. M-5 Communications, Inc. v. ITA Telecommunications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API