Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tripp v. Hutchings

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1958No. 20115Published

1DissentMobley, Justice

In my opinion Code (Ann.) § 113-709 is inapplicable to the question involved here. That section has reference to the transfer and conveyance of real property located in Georgia to the distributees or devisees mentioned in a will executed and probated in another State. The pertinent provisions of the will here in question provide as follows: “I direct the executor of my estate ... to sell the real and personal property owned by me and located at Macon, Georgia . . .” and, after paying certain expenses, “I give the net proceeds then remaining from said sale to my beloved wife . . . up to but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linker v. . LinkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Anglin v. HooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API