Legal Opinion
Crutsinger v. Davis
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 4, 2019No. 19-5755Relating-toCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.
Petitioner Billy Jack Crutsinger seeks to reopen his petition for habeas corpus under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). This Rule requires that the movant "show 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the reopening of a final judgment." Gonzalez v. Crosby , 54. 5 U. S. 524 , 535, 125 S.Ct. 2641 , 162 L.Ed.2d 480 (2005) (quoting Ackermann v. United States , 340 U.S. 193 , 199, 71 S.Ct. 209 , 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950) ). The District Court denied Crutsinger's Rule 60(b) motion and the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ronald W. Dowell, Administrator of the Estate of Jackie Lynn Dowell, Deceased v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Israel Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akins v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Emoshia Duncan v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- Flaherty v. LockeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- ROBINSON V. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
- Rentberry, Inc. v. the City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020