Legal Opinion

Hanauer & Co. v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court. lion. L. L. Mack, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBowen, J.

Tlio appellee brought an action of assumpsit against the appellants, in the circuit court of Randolph county, upon a promissory note, payable in Confederate bonds or Tennessee money, dated January, 26,1862, due at date.

Defendants, L. Hanauer & Co., filed a demurrer, which was overruled; they then plead non-assumpsit and illegality of consideration. Plaintiff replied in short, Upon the record. The cause was submitted to the court, sitting as a jury, who declared the law to be, that “the note being the only evidence, and promise to pay in one of two articles, although one be illegal, the court…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Piper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
  3. EDM & Associates, Inc. v. GEM CellularDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ensign v. CoffeltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Hollenberg Music Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API