Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jackson Title Corp. v. Swayne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1982No. 12757Published

1DissentSchott, Judge

I concur with the majority in affirming the judgment of the trial court on the main demand of Jackson Title Corporation and the judgment on the incidental demands to the extent of holding the notary and surety liable to appellant Swayne and exonerating from liability the assessor and the city notary. However, I dissent from the limitation of Swayne’s recovery to the amount of his purchase price.

Swayne’s cause of action against the notary is based simply on C.C.Art. 2315 which obliges the notary to repair the damage she caused Swayne by her fault in failing to order the proper research…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ralston Purina Co. v. ConeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API