Legal Opinion
Sentinel Pipe Services, Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 19, 1992No. 2-91-203-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
2Per curiam
On this day came on to be considered by the Court that the appellant’s brief has not been filed in this case, said brief having been due in this Court on January 15,1992; the time for the same having been twice before extended.
There being no explanation given for the third failure to timely file the brief, on the Court’s own motion this appeal is ordered dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R.APP.P. 74(1X1).
It is further ordered that appellants, Sentinel Pipe Services, Inc. and Kent A. Russell, Individually, pay all costs in this behalf expended,…
3Cited by10 opinions
- Benny E. Jay v. Robert E. McCool, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Bernard Joseph Richard v. Karla Kay Richard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Lonnie E. Daniels, Jr. and Lonitta Daniels v. Scott Penn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Marty L. Griffith, Marty L. Griffith & Associates, Hou-Tex Exploration, Inc. and Enviro-Search of America, Inc. v. Diane Bailey, Leroy Kristek and Doris Wooten, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.