Legal Opinion
Trustees of the Cincinnati Southern Railway v. Roth
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
1Opinion of the Court
Under an act of the general assembly fqund in 93 Ohio Laws, page 637, supplementary to the act under which the Cincinnati Southern Railway was constructed (66 O. L., 80), bonds have been issued —approved by a vote of the people — and with the proceeds the trustees of said railway, acting on behalf of the city of Cincinnati, have acquired certain land for the purpose and have partially constructed thereon a viaduct extending from Eighth street and McLean avenue to Third and Front streets in said city. This viaduct is not yet completed, but has been and will be held by said trustees who are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Inhabitants of Worcester County v. Mayor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Foster v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Gregory Addington v. Senior Vice President Human RCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2026
- Marc Homer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Nealley v. GreenoughSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.