Legal Opinion

Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1936No. 1336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Gasoline Products Company brought this suit against Champlin Refining Company to enjoin the infringement of three patents and for an accounting.

The patents involved are: Rosenbaum, No. 1,324,983, issued- December 16, 1919, all the claims of which are in suit; Cross, No. 1,734,079, applied for February 16, 1925, and issued November 5, 1929, claims 4 and 5 of which are in suit; and Howard and Loomis, No. 1,869,337, applied for May 23, 1921, and issued July 26, 1932, claims 7 to 11 inclusive of which are in suit.

From a decree holding the Rosenbaum patent invalid and not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Inc. v. O. M. Franklin Blackleg Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Anderson-Prichard Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Tschappat v. Hinderliter Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. Texas Co. v. Anderson-Prichard Refining Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API