United States v. Livan Alfonso Raad
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Livan Alfonso Raad appeals his sixty-month sentence, imposed following his guilty plea for three counts of smuggling aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. The issue presented is whether the mandatory minimum sentence prescribed under § 1324 violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. 1 We hold that it does not.
Raad, indicted for sixty-seven counts relating to alien smuggling, pleaded guilty to three counts of smuggling aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Although the district court calculated Raad’s sentencing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BecklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.