Legal Opinion

United States v. Livan Alfonso Raad

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 21, 2005No. 03-15300PublishedCited by 81 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Livan Alfonso Raad appeals his sixty-month sentence, imposed following his guilty plea for three counts of smuggling aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. The issue presented is whether the mandatory minimum sentence prescribed under § 1324 violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. 1 We hold that it does not.

Raad, indicted for sixty-seven counts relating to alien smuggling, pleaded guilty to three counts of smuggling aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Although the district court calculated Raad’s sentencing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. BecklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API