Legal Opinion

Kowalski v. Chandler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1953No. 11624_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, a professional baseball player, brought suit in the district court to recover treble damages by reason of the alleged violation by appellees of Sections 1, 2, and 3. of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, and 3, and under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15. Appellant’s action is based upon the claim that appellees, by a monopoly over trade and commerce, exercised through professional “organized baseball,” have, by means of players’ contracts and agreements among the several clubs in the various leagues, deprived appellant of the reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball ClubsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Gardella v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Russell A. Welch, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Piazza v. Major League BaseballDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Budd Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API