Hickman v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Defendant A.V. Hickman brings this direct appeal from his conviction for murder. The following issues are presented:
1. the State's use of peremptory challenges;
2. cross-examination of defendant regarding other crimes;
3. sufficiency of evidence.
We affirm.
1. Peremptory Challenges
The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the prosecutor to challenge potential jurors solely on account of their race; however, a defendant has no absolute right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race. Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 476 U.S. 79, 106…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- McKinney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990