Legal Opinion

Hickman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1987No. 48S00-8602-CR-133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant A.V. Hickman brings this direct appeal from his conviction for murder. The following issues are presented:

1. the State's use of peremptory challenges;

2. cross-examination of defendant regarding other crimes;

3. sufficiency of evidence.

We affirm.

1. Peremptory Challenges

The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the prosecutor to challenge potential jurors solely on account of their race; however, a defendant has no absolute right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race. Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 476 U.S. 79, 106…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. McKinney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API