Legal Opinion

Frederick Wholesale Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 19, 1983No. Court 83-1-00074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

This matter is before me on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment. Plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment.

Plaintiff alleges in its complaint that the January 29, 1982 notice of liquidation of Entry No. 792888 is “null and void” since said notice was not in accordance with the terms of 19 U.S.C. § 1500(e) (1982) 1 and 19 C.F.R. § 159.9(b) (1983) 2 . Plaintiff argues that absent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Schering Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  2. Frederick Wholesale Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Samuel Aaron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GmbH & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API